Friedl v. Airsource, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the learned intermediary doctrine bars actions against manufacturers, not distributors, of prescribed medical devices
• when review is de novo, “the report of proceedings providing the rationale for the trial court’s dismissal is not essential to our disposition”
• when review is de novo, “the report of proceedings providing the rationale for the trial court’s dismissal is not essential to our disposition”
• because review of a motion to dismiss is de novo, “the report of proceedings providing the rationale for the [circuit] court’s dismissal is not essential to our disposition”
• because review of a motion to dismiss is de novo, “the report of proceedings providing the rationale for the trial court’s dismissal is not essential to our disposition”
• because the matter before us is reviewed de novo, the report of proceedings providing the rationale for the trial court's dismissal is not essential to our disposition and we consider this appeal on its merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).