Skip to main content
· 3/19/1900

Friedburg v. Nudd

Citations

  • 9 Kan. App. 743
  • 60 P. 476
  • 1900 Kan. App. LEXIS 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the district court was correct in finding the defendants violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights by terminating her from her teaching position without providing proper notice and opportunity to be heard, but not addressing statute of limitations
  • affirming district court’s finding that defendants deprived plaintiff of due process when they terminated her employment without providing her with complete notice and an opportunity to be heard
  • employer violated the plaintiff’s pretermination due-process rights where charges identified in the termination letter differed from those identified in the termination notice
  • discussing state statute that protects teachers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Milton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.