Friedberg v. Chubb and Son, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer’s interpretation was “at a minimum, fairly debatable,” which “precludes a finding of bad faith”
• finding that Chubb’s position on interpreting the ensuing loss provision was, at a minimum, fairly debatable, precluding a finding of bad faith
• “[The insurer’s] interpretation of the terms, is at the very least fairly debatable and thus not in bad faith.”
• interpreting Minn. Stat. § 604.18
• applying § 604.18, subd. 4(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Selective Ins. Co. of S.C. v. Sela
  D. Maine· 2018-11-27· cited 26×
• Martin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
  D. Minnesota· 2011-11-21· cited 1×
• Peterson v. W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2019-06-03

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blaine Construction Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Insurance Company of North America, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-04-12· cited 53×
• Poling v. Wisconsin Physicians Service
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-09-18· cited 41×
• Montefiore Medical Center v. American Protection Insurance
  S.D. New York· 2002-09-27· cited 27×
• Narob Development Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-09-07· cited 24×
• DeRoche v. All American Bottling Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 1998-11-05· cited 23×
• Lunsford v. RBC DAIN RAUSCHER, INC.
  D. Minnesota· 2008-12-17· cited 22×
• Nunn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
  N.D. Texas· 2010-06-23· cited 19×
• Hudson Universal, Ltd. v. Aetna Insurance
  D. New Jersey· 1997-12-12· cited 13×
• Adam v. Stonebridge Life Insurance
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-07-15· cited 11×
• Eckstein v. Cincinnati Insurance
  W.D. Kentucky· 2007-01-10· cited 7×