Friedberg v. Chubb and Son, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer’s interpretation was “at a minimum, fairly debatable,” which “precludes a finding of bad faith”
• finding that Chubb’s position on interpreting the ensuing loss provision was, at a minimum, fairly debatable, precluding a finding of bad faith
• “[The insurer’s] interpretation of the terms, is at the very least fairly debatable and thus not in bad faith.”
• interpreting Minn. Stat. § 604.18
• applying § 604.18, subd. 4(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).