Skip to main content
· 7/1/1861

Fridenberg v. Pierson

Citations

  • 18 Cal. 152

Syllabus

<p>A junior attaching creditor cannot take advantage of irregularities in the affida- . vit or bond given by a prior attaching creditor of a common debtor.</p> <p>The fact that an affidavit for an attachment omits to aver that the sum for which the writ is asked is “an actual bona fide existing debt, due and owing from the defendant to the plaintiff, and that the attachment is not sought and the action is not prosecuted to hinder delay or defraud any creditor or creditors of the debt,” does not render the attachment issued a nullity as against subsequent attaching creditors.</p>

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.