Fridena v. Arizona Osteopathic Medical Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpretation of statute offered by Attorney General is not binding because he may \change his mind ... and he may be replaced in office\
• “If the district judge had read Wisconsin’s new ... statute so narrowly as to obviate all constitutional questions, it would still be possible for the state to prosecute people for violating the statute as broadly construed, because the enforcement of the statute would not have been enjoined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).