Frick v. Amtrak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring expert testimony regarding whether a train’s speed was “excessive” because “the standards governing the operation of [train operators] are distinctly related to an occupation that is 999 ‘beyond the ken of the average layperson’” (alterations in original
• requiring expert testimony for claim that train was moving too quickly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).