Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/25/1964
Frias v. State
Citations
- 376 S.W.2d 764
- 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 907
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘The acts which make the defendant a principal need not be alleged in the indictment. A principal offender may be charged directly with the commission of the offense although it may not have actually been committed by him . . .’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rollerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27· cited 296×
- Joseph Bennard Nichols v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1995-11-20· cited 177×
- Ybarra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-11-22· cited 3×
- Nichols v. ScottFifth Circuit· 1995-11-20
- Livingston v. Upper Cumberland HumanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-03-12
- Rollerson, Kerry LarnezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.