Frezzell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While the trial court did not consider the issue of materiality in the instant case, we comment upon the record”
• in light of “overwhelming testimonial evidence,” it could not be said that “any exculpatory description of a witness who gave a name and address that could not be traced would have created a reasonable doubt as to guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 25×
• Matthews v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-07-26· cited 24×
• Williams v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-08-18· cited 22×
• Zanders v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-07-29· cited 19×
• Gibson v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-25· cited 15×
• Bellanger v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-12· cited 12×
• Boone v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-03-29· cited 11×

Other cases named Frezzell v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Frezzell v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-10-30