Skip to main content
· 10/3/1887

Frey v. Heydt

Citations

  • 116 Pa. 601
  • 11 A. 535
  • 1887 Pa. LEXIS 428

Syllabus

<p>Parol declarations of a parent are inadmissible to establish that money for which he held a bond against a child was an advancement, unless they are shown to be a part of the res gestee and accompany the execution of the note, or are corroborative of acts and declarations that were contemporaneous.</p>

Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Mercur, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.