Freund v. A. Shapiro & Son

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that § 188 applies only when the parties have not designated a choice of law provision
• noting that in the absence of a choice of law provision in a contract, the court should use the law of the state that bears the most significant relationship to the contract
• following Sections 187 and 188 of the Restatement (Second) in relation to contract claims
• noting factors to be considered, including the place of contracting and contract negotiations, place of performance, location of the subject matter of the contract, and the places of incorporation and businesses of the parties
• adopting Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Law Sec. 188 (1971)
• adopting Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Law § 188 (1971)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).