Frenchtown Acquisition Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding charge nurses were not supervisors despite conclusory testimony by director of nursing as to their authority to discipline
• finding that “routine adjustments to patient assignments, such as pulling an aide from a resident because a resident requests it” did not involve independent judgment
• “General testimony asserting that employees have supervisory responsibilities is not sufficient to satisfy the burden of proof when there is no specific evidence supporting the testimony.”
• “General testimony asserting that employees have supervisory responsibilities is not sufficient to satisfy the burden of proof when there is no specific evidence supporting the testimony.”
• no supervisory status for nurses who, in a progressive disciplinary system, had authority only to “bring [nurses’] aide errors or misconduct to a manager’s attention,” but not to “decide how to proceed” with that information
• no supervisory status for nurses who, in a progressive disciplinary system, had authority only to “bring [nurses’] aide errors or misconduct to a manager’s attention,” but not to “decide how to proceed” with that information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).