Skip to main content
· 9/24/2013

Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District v. Heineman

Citations

  • 974 F. Supp. 2d 1264
  • 2013 WL 5367353
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an insurer’s duty to investigate is contractual
  • “an insurer’s business is to investigate claims that may or may not result in litigation”
  • the insurer made the required showing to sustain work product protection where it showed, from “specific facts,” that it anticipated litigation and its lawyers and investigators obtained witness statements to prepare for that litigation
  • discussing this distinction as “important”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bataillon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.