French v. Grindle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contract for professional services gives rise to duty to exercise degree of care, skill, and competence that reasonably competent members of profession would exercise under similar circumstances
• holding that contract for professional services gives rise to duty to exercise degree of care, skill, and competence that reasonably competent members of profession would exercise under similar circumstances
• holding that the plaintiffs attempt to impose a duty through a voluntary undertaking theory “necessarily” failed because the plaintiff did not present evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact on reliance or increased harm
• holding that the plaintiff’s attempt to impose a duty through a voluntary undertaking theory “necessarily” failed because the plaintiff did not present evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact on reliance or increased harm
• holding that the plaintiff’s attempt to impose a duty through a voluntary undertaking theory “necessarily” failed because the plaintiff did not present evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact on reliance or increased harm
• concluding that a court is not required to consider professional codes of ethics in 2 Dorman provided deposition testimony that H&M does not perform any engineering services for Verizon in Texas. 5 conducting a duty analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).