French v. Eagle Nursing Home, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under Minnesota law, \the plaintiff must identify who made the defamatory statement\
• holding that, under Minnesota law, \the plaintiff must identify who made the defamatory statement\
• holding that defendant’s statements that plaintiff was a “terrible nurse” and “shouldn’t be 30 working” in nursing are not defamatory because the statements “cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts,” are not precise or verifiable, and cannot be proven true or false

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).