French Republic v. Board of Supervisors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that contract implied in fact would “include a comparable expiration provision” like parties’ prior written agreements had
• dismissing plaintiff’s quasi-contract claim because valid contract governed the parties’ relationship and plaintiff’s damages for quasi-contract claim were the same as breach of contract claim
• finding “conclusory allegations” insufficient to state a claim given “complete lack of any factual allegations plausibly suggesting that defendant delayed the transaction”
• \plaintiff may not recover under a quasi-contractual theory when the parties had a valid contract governing their relationship\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).