Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving an unscheduled injury which occurred outside Arizona but became part of a subsequent claim
• involving an unscheduled injury which occurred outside Arizona but became part of a subsequent claim
• “a stranger to a litigation may not be bound by a determination made therein for purposes of subsequent litigation”
• “[I]t is axiomatic that a stranger to a litigation may not be bound by a determination made therein for purposes of subsequent litigation.”
• “a stranger to a litigation may not be bound by a determination made therein for purposes of subsequent litigation”
• “[B]y reasons of comity, we recognize that 16 the claimant suffered an industrial injury in New Jersey.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).