Skip to main content
· 3/31/1999

Fremont Compensation Insurance v. Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corp.

Citations

  • 710 N.E.2d 132
  • 304 Ill. App. 3d 734
  • 237 Ill. Dec. 709
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that insurer was obligated to defend where it appeared that injury at least potentially occurred within the policy period
  • explaining that insurer was obligated to defend where it appeared that injury at least potentially occurred within the policy period
  • relying on Ainsworth Seed Co. and Envirodyne to consider extrinsic evidence on the question of coverage
  • relying on Ainsworth Seed Co. and Envirodyne to consider extrinsic evidence on the question of coverage
  • “it is [a] party’s obligation to secure a ruling on [his] objection, and the failure to obtain such a ruling operates as a waiver [(forfeiture)] of the objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.