· 3/31/1999
Fremont Compensation Insurance v. Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corp.
Citations
- 710 N.E.2d 132
- 304 Ill. App. 3d 734
- 237 Ill. Dec. 709
- 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that insurer was obligated to defend where it appeared that injury at least potentially occurred within the policy period
- explaining that insurer was obligated to defend where it appeared that injury at least potentially occurred within the policy period
- relying on Ainsworth Seed Co. and Envirodyne to consider extrinsic evidence on the question of coverage
- relying on Ainsworth Seed Co. and Envirodyne to consider extrinsic evidence on the question of coverage
- “it is [a] party’s obligation to secure a ruling on [his] objection, and the failure to obtain such a ruling operates as a waiver [(forfeiture)] of the objection”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.