Freiman v. Lazur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a defendant’s registration of a copyright at the U.S. Copyright Office in the District of Columbia was excluded by the government contact principle
• finding no personal jurisdiction under Section 13 — 423(a)(1) where contracts were executed and performed outside of the District of Columbia, defendants had no offices in the jurisdiction, and all parties worked and resided outside of the District
• defendant’s application to U.S. Copyright Office of allegedly fraudulent copyright protected by government contacts exception and “cannot serve a as a basis for asserting personal jurisdiction over him”
• same with respect to the U.S. Copyright Office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).