Freeny v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding possession of a firearm by codefendant in course of robbery is sufficient to support conviction of defendant for armed robbery pursuant to principal theory
• confirming that to warrant imposition of enhancement under section 775.087 “the state must prove that the defendant had actual physical possession of the weapon”
• stating “possession of a firearm by a co-defendant is sufficient to convict a defendant of armed robbery, pursuant to the principal theory. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).