Freemon v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a rule 1.540(b)(3) motion must specify the fraud with particularity and explain why the fraud, if it exists, would entitle the movant to have the judgment set aside
• party not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on motion to set aside final judgment for fraud where motion failed to “specify the fraud with particularity and explain why the fraud, if it exists, would entitle the movant to have the judgment set aside.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).