Freeman v. Williamson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Illinois statute of repose differs from a statute of limitations in that the statute of repose is substantive rather than procedural
• holding that the Illinois statute of repose differs from a statute of limitations in that the statute of repose is substantive rather than procedural
• “A statute of repose differs from a statute of limitations in that it is substantive rather than procedural.”
• “A statute of repose differs from a statute of limitations in that it is substantive rather than pro- cedural.” (citing Ferguson v. McKenzie, 780 N.E.2d 660, 664 (Ill. 2001))
• “So long as a choice of law provision does not contravene Illinois public policy and there is some relationship between the chosen forum and the parties to the transaction, an express choice of law provision will be given full effect.”
• “So long as a choice of law provision does not contravene Illinois public policy and there is some relationship between the chosen forum and the parties to the transaction, an express choice of law provision will be given full effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).