· 12/29/2009
Freeman v. Swift
Citations
- 776 N.W.2d 485
- 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1313
- 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 227
- 2009 WL 5092034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he determination of whether a communication is entitled to immunity under section 554.03 depends on the nature of the statement, the purpose of the statement, and the intended audience.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Stoneburner, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.