Skip to main content
· 12/29/2009

Freeman v. Swift

Citations

  • 776 N.W.2d 485
  • 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1313
  • 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 227
  • 2009 WL 5092034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he determination of whether a communication is entitled to immunity under section 554.03 depends on the nature of the statement, the purpose of the statement, and the intended audience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Stoneburner, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.