Freeman v. Pennsylvania State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the ALJ properly determined that a firearm applicant could not collaterally attack his underlying criminal conviction
• noting that “[t]o determine the issue of equivalency,” at least in context of denial of application to purchase and carry firearm, “the necessary focus is on the elements of the offenses”
• comparing offense elements to determine whether a New York conviction [J-14-2022] - 6 restricted the appellant’s ability to possess firearms in Pennsylvania

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).