Freeman v. Medstar Health Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having considered all of Defendants’ remaining arguments ..., the; court-concludes that each is without merit.”
• declining to consider CBA in connection with plaintiffs’ wage claims, even though it “contain[ed] numerous provisions that relate to hours, including meal breaks”
• finding the complaint sufficient where the plaintiff alleged that the violations occurred numerous times, with unpaid overtime work occurring during between 50% and 100% of meal breaks
• denying-in-part and granting-in-part motion to dismiss where the parties agreed that, for the issues relevant to that motion, the same analysis was applicable to the FLSA and the DC-MWA claims
• “Because Plaintiffs do not bring claims under the Collective Bargaining Agreement, the Court cannot consider the Agreement without converting the pending motion to a motion for summary judgment.”
• “Where a complaint alleges, as the amended complaint does, that overtime hours were worked but overtime wages were not received, it sufficiently states a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).