Freeman v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “by changing her status to on-call employment petitioner had maximized the possibility that she would not have work[, and,] [i]n that sense, the agency.could find that petitioner had not taken all reasonable steps to preserve her employment.”
• an employee has ‘an obligation to preserve his employment relationship.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).