Freeman Oldsmobile Mazda Co. v. Pinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff failed to prove revocation after he refused a car dealership’s offer to make repairs at no cost to him
• holding “as a matter of law that a $75 to $100 defect in a $5,720.33 automobile [or just over 1% of the car’s total value] is not such a nonconformity as to substantially impair the value of the car.”
• application for writ of error refused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).