Freeman--Hampton Oil Corp. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the title “[s]hall it be a gross misdemeanor to capture an animal with certain body-gripping traps, or to poison an animal with sodium fluoroacetate or sodium cyanide” was general
• determining that a ban on trapping animals with certain body-gripping traps was rationally related or \germane to\ a ban on killing animals with certain pesticides
• determining that a ban on trapping animals with certain body-gripping traps was rationally related or “germane to” a ban on killing animals with certain pesticides
• explaining that a new enactment did not “alter preexisting rights or duties to an impermissible degree”
• holding title “Shall it be a gross misdemeanor to capture an animal with certain body-gripping traps, or to poison an animal with sodium' fluoroacetate or sodium cyanide?” was a general title
• discussing “general” and “specific” titles and reaffirming that “the ‘rational unity’ analysis” applies to legislation bearing a “general” title

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).