Freeland v. Fields's Ex'ors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was no evidence that the husband’s 1997 income would continue at the elevated level where there was testimony that overtime opportunities would no longer be available
• noting that mere knowledge that an offense is being committed is not the same as participation with criminal intent, and mere presence at the scene is not sufficient to establish participation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).