Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding service occurs within the United States and applying Rule 4(h)(1)
• “[B]ased on a textual reading of subsections (h) and (f)(3) of Rule 4 …service cannot occur in the United States” pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3)
• “[B]ased on a textual reading of subsections (h) and (f)(3) of Rule 4 …service cannot occur in the United States” pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3)
• “[B]ased on a textual reading of subsections (h) and (f)(3) of Rule 4 …service cannot occur in the United States” pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3)
• “[B]ased on a textual reading of subsections (h) and (f)(3) of Rule 4 . . . service cannot occur in the United States” pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3)
• rejecting alternative method of service under Rule 4(f)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).