freealliance.com, LLC v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing tension implicit in objecting to court’s own need for a continuance but nonetheless requiring objection for rule 36 purposes, in part to apprise judge of continuance’s speedy trial implications
• “formalized objection . . . serves the vital purpose of notifying both the prosecutor and the court that attendant delays may not be excluded from the operation of the rule”
• “Where the solution to the problem is within the control of defense counsel . . . it is reasonable to expect him to proceed diligently to correct it and to impose upon him the primary obligation to inquire into the status of his motions . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).