Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “under First Amendment case law,” laws impacting pornography are “viewed differently” than those regulating political speech
• finding that “[s]uch a common sense conclusion is certainly within the realm of congressional authority”
• “[I]t is clear that the statute and regulation do not constitute a ‘prior restraint’ as traditionally described by the Supreme Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).