Skip to main content
· 4/8/1999

Fredrick P. Godfredson v. Hess & Clark, Inc.

Citations

  • 173 F.3d 365
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6266
  • 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 199
  • 1999 WL 189899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that store manager could not be held responsible for a drop in sales attributable to an economic downturn and therefore the legitimacy of the employer’s expectation of sales growth was a genuine issue of material fact
  • rejecting the plaintiffs age discrimination claim under the ADEA and finding that the defendant engaged in a valid RIF
  • explaining that the fourth prong of the prima facie - 10 - No. 05-5009 Wu v. Tyson Foods, Inc. case is modified when the employee is dismissed due to a reduction-in-force “because in a reduction-of-force situation the plaintiff is not in fact replaced”
  • “[A]n employee’s termination, even if based upon discrimination, does not rise to the level of ‘extreme and outrageous conduct’ without proof of something more.”
  • discussing standard under identical Ohio law
  • discussing standard under identical Ohio law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Kennedy, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.