Fredonia State Bank v. General American Life Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it has never been a part of an appellate court’s duties to search the record for factual assertions or order re-briefing
• holding that motion for new trial filed after original judgment, but before amended judgment, was sufficient to preserve factual-insufficiency points
• recognizing that “an appellate court has some discretion to choose [to] deem[] a point waived”
• holding that it has never been a part of an appellate court's duties to search the record for evidence itself
• holding that it has never been a part of an appellate court's duties to search the record for evidence itself
• holding that it has never been a part of an appellate court's duties to, itself, engage in a time-consuming review of a voluminous record for evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).