Fredette v. Connecticut Air National Guard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plain and unambiguous text of statute should not be read in manner that leads to absurd or unworkable results; we presume legislature intended just and rational results when enacting legislation
• courts ‘‘read statutes to be consistent, rather than to conflict, with each other’’
• urging legislature to address gaps and inconsistencies in statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).