Frederick v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the salary paid to the president of the company was not a fraudulent conveyance because there was “no evidence that his salary was either excessive or unreasonable, or that the corporation did not receive full value in return.”
• holding that an insolvent corporation’s salary payments to a corporate officer did not lack fair consideration because there was “no evidence that [the] salary was either excessive or unreasonable, or that the corporation did not receive full value in return”
• regular payments of salary were not fraudulent conveyances without evidence that the salary was excessive or unreasonable
• salary paid to the president of the company was not a fraudulent conveyance because there was “no evidence that his salary was either excessive or unreasonable, or that the corporation did not receive full value in return.”
• salary paid to the president of the company was not a fraudulent conveyance because there was “no evidence that his salary was either excessive or unreasonable, or that the corporation did not receive full value in return.”
• salary paid to the president of the company was not a fraudulent conveyance because there was “no evidence that his salary was either excessive or unreasonable, or that the corporation did not receive full value in return.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).