Frederick v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s sua sponte order that purported to modify the defendant’s probation violated double jeopardy and was also an unauthorized extension under section 948.06

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-19· cited 7×
• Richter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-18· cited 2×
• Garcia-Medina v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-18· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Troupe v. Rowe
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-05· cited 123×
• Patrick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-09-17· cited 11×
• Peyton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-13· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-12-04· cited 4×