Frederick v. Missouri River, Ft. Scott & Gule Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that erroneous admission of evidence was not harmless because “the [complainant’s] credibility had been attacked by the defense with some success”
• holding that erroneous admission of evidence was not harmless because “the case was ultimately and essentially a credibility contest between the [complainant] and the defendant” and “the [complainant’s] credibility had been attacked by the defense with some success”
• state trooper’s testimony that victim’s contradictory testimony should not diminish her credibility was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).