Skip to main content
· 11/25/2002

Frederick v. Henderson

Citations

  • 232 F. Supp. 2d 901
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22980
  • 2002 WL 31681588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employer’s act of protesting unemployment benefits for terminated employee was not, by itself, an “adverse employment action” under Title VII
  • “An employer has a right to protest an employee’s unemployment benefits if it reasonably believes it has legitimate grounds to do so. Thus, USPS’s act of protesting Frederick’s unemployment benefits, alone, was not an adverse employment action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norgle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.