Frederick Shotz v. American Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Rehabilitation Act inapplicable where funds airlines received from Congress after the September 11 terrorist attacks were compensatory and not considered subsidies consisting of “federal financial assistance”
• “[U]pon ‘find[ing] the terms of a statute unambiguous, judicial inquiry is complete.’” (quoting Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm’n, 481 U.S. 454, 461 (1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).