Frederick J. Page, Jr. And Kristin D. Page v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc., and Joseph McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice despite plaintiffs’ claim that compelled arbitration would force them to “restart the entire [pretrial preparation] process before a new tribunal” almost two years after complaint was filed
• finding no prejudice despite plaintiffs argument that it would need to “restart the entire process” nearly two years after the complaint was filed
• “[T]he makings of a ‘pattern of racketeering’ are not yet clear, but the fact remains that a ‘pattern’ for civil purposes is a ‘pattern’ for criminal purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).