Frederick J. Keitel III v. Peter J. Callahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding venue in the Southern District of New York proper when the defendant's co-conspirator performed an overt act in Manhattan in furtherance of their conspiracy
• noting that reasonably made strategic calls do not support ineffective assistance claim
• finding venue in the Southern 10 District of New York proper when the defendant’s co‐conspirator performed an overt 11 act in Manhattan in furtherance of their conspiracy
• “[P]hone calls from one district to another by themselves can establish venue in either district as long as the calls further the conspiracy.”
• venue proper based on coconspirator’s calls from inside venue to victim outside of venue
• venue proper based on co-conspirator’s calls from inside venue to victim outside of venue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).