Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. Curtiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The PTO does not have means to conduct a marketing survey to determine whether the public actually made a goods/ place association .... ”
• fraud as complete defense to damages action under “unenforceability” language of 35 U.S.C. § 282(1)
• “[Title] 35 U.S.C. § 6 [now § 2(b)(2)(A) ] ... gives the Commissioner authority to establish regulations governing the conduct of proceedings in the Patent Office. We have long held that such regulations, when not inconsistent with the statutes, have the force and effect of law.”
• “[Title] 35 U.S.C. § 6 [now § 2(b)(2)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).