Skip to main content
· 9/30/1999

Frederick H. Groce v. Eli Lilly & Company

Citations

  • 193 F.3d 496
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741
  • 1999 WL 773546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
  • noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
  • noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
  • noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
  • noting that established law of this circuit is that the “usual practice” is to dismiss without prejudice state supplemental claims whenever federal claims have been dismissed before trial
  • noting that established law of this circuit is that the “usual practice” is to dismiss without prejudice state supplemental claims whenever federal claims have been dismissed before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.