· 9/30/1999
Frederick H. Groce v. Eli Lilly & Company
Citations
- 193 F.3d 496
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741
- 1999 WL 773546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
- noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
- noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
- noting that the rule is dismissal unless state claims are frivolous or a “no brainer”
- noting that established law of this circuit is that the “usual practice” is to dismiss without prejudice state supplemental claims whenever federal claims have been dismissed before trial
- noting that established law of this circuit is that the “usual practice” is to dismiss without prejudice state supplemental claims whenever federal claims have been dismissed before trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.