Skip to main content
· 9/8/2000

Frederick H. Dambach, Claimant-Appellant v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 1376
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22680
  • 2000 WL 1273562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stressing need for certain cases \to be concluded\ and suggesting that this Court has authority to \set a deadline by which veteran's case will be concluded\
  • “[T]he remand may make unreviewable the determination that [the statute] cannot be applied to a veteran ...”
  • “We do have jurisdiction . . . when there is a statutory at 209 (Falvey, J., dissenting
  • “We do have jurisdiction . . . when there is a statutory at 209 (Falvey, J., dissenting
  • \[w]e believe it would be appropriate for the . . . Court to set a deadline by which this veteran's case will be concluded\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Archer, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.