· 9/8/2000
Frederick H. Dambach, Claimant-Appellant v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Citations
- 223 F.3d 1376
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22680
- 2000 WL 1273562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stressing need for certain cases \to be concluded\ and suggesting that this Court has authority to \set a deadline by which veteran's case will be concluded\
- “[T]he remand may make unreviewable the determination that [the statute] cannot be applied to a veteran ...”
- “We do have jurisdiction . . . when there is a statutory at 209 (Falvey, J., dissenting
- “We do have jurisdiction . . . when there is a statutory at 209 (Falvey, J., dissenting
- \[w]e believe it would be appropriate for the . . . Court to set a deadline by which this veteran's case will be concluded\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Archer, Linn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.