Frederick E. Hopper v. United States Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere existence of a federal detainer alone is not sufficient to render petitioner in federal custody
• habeas petition seeking application of credit was premature because the hearing to decide whether to apply pretrial custody credit to sentence had not yet been held
• a “warrant is not considered ‘executed’ where a parolee has been arrested on an independent intervening charge, and a detainer is placed at the institution with custody”
• state inmate’s claims challenging legality of federal parole revocation detainer are premature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).