Frederick County Fruit Growers Ass'n v. McLaughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing Gomez v. Florida State Employment Service, 417 F.2d 569 (5th Cir.1969) with DeLaFuente v. Stokely-VanCamp, Inc., 514 F.Supp. 68 (C.D.Ill.1981
• denying restitution for 1984 harvest because of growers’ reasonable- reliance upon 1983 regulation
• by amending their job clearance orders to include promise to pay proportional increase rate, Growers received DOL certification and entered into contracts with Farmworkers to pay higher wages
• Growers paid average worker piece rate in reliance on new DOL regulation of “dubious validity,” which was later found to be invalid, and in direct violation of this Court’s order
• “The terms of [an H–2A] job clearance order which reflect DOL requirements become a part of the employment contract as a matter of law” even where “none of the Farmworkers saw or relied upon the promise of higher wages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).