Skip to main content
· 11/6/1996

Freddo v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

Citations

  • 685 So. 2d 874
  • 1996 WL 637238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if claimant violated company policy by asking personal favors of co-workers, his behavior did not constitute willful disregard of employer's interests
  • reversing the appeals referee’s finding of misconduct when the claimant violated a company policy which prohibited the solicitation of personal favors from subordinates, but did not know that such conduct would result in termination until he was terminated
  • misconduct typically involves repeated violations of explicit policies after several warnings
  • misconduct typically involves repeated violations of explicit policies after several warnings
  • misconduct typically involves repeated violations of explicit policies after several warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.