Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. Garrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no right to solicit petition signatures at supermarket marketing itself as one-stop shop and offering mailboxes, automated teller machines, public telephones, and seating areas because invitation to public not sufficiently broad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Glovsky v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-10-10· cited 29×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 124×
• Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-03-23· cited 51×
• Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-05-09· cited 44×
• State v. Cargill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-31· cited 42×
• Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-02-24· cited 16×
• Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Klein Campaigns, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-07· cited 4×