· 6/7/2001
Fred J. Hart v. Schering-Plough Corporation
Citations
- 253 F.3d 272
- 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1389
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11814
- 2001 WL 624887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The amount in controversy is whatever is required to satisfy the plaintiffs demand, in full, on the date suit begins.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.