Skip to main content
· 6/7/2001

Fred J. Hart v. Schering-Plough Corporation

Citations

  • 253 F.3d 272
  • 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1389
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11814
  • 2001 WL 624887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The amount in controversy is whatever is required to satisfy the plaintiffs demand, in full, on the date suit begins.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.