Fred G. Staub and Yvonne G. Staub v. G. H. Harris, James P. Harris, and G. H. Harris Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the FDCPA “was intended to apply ‘only to debts contracted by consumers for personal, family or household purposes’; even the collection of commercial accounts is beyond its coverage.”
• observing that the FDCPA “was intended to apply only to debts contracted by consumers for personal, family or household purposes,” and that “even the collection of commercial accounts is beyond its coverage” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \The [FDCPA] does not apply to persons or businesses collecting debts on their own behalf.\
• “The [FDCPA] does not apply to persons or businesses collecting debts on their own behalf.”
• “The [FDCPA] does not apply to persons or businesses collecting debts on their own behalf.”
• “The [FDCPA] does not apply to persons or businesses collecting debts on their own behalf.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).